I guess this means I need to read The Sound and the Fury three more times to get it.
From The Paris Review’s interview with Faulkner.
Good answer. A lit professor once told my class that in order to understand a poem it was necessary to read it three times, one of them out loud. Maybe an out-loud third reading of Faulkner would solve the mystery.
Reblogged this on D.e.e.L's Writing and Various Nonsense.
I love this!! So glad Faulkner could have a sense of humor about his style – he is certainly not for everyone. (Me included!)
Reblogged this on literaryboners and commented:
Faulkner is a badass, but do you think this mentality holds up given the abundance of content on the Internet today? Do you think people will still wade through tough works, when there are so many attention-grabbing headlines promising instant gratification?
Honestly, I don’t find Faulkner’s style too intimidating. I just don’t think one should expect to understand the nuances of every single sentence or even paragraph. His prose just flows right into me, so from my standpoint, the meaning is not always the point. A bit like some art, no? (Also, Wikipedia does help, if worse comes to worse).
I would read something not for 4 times but thousands of times if the person who made it is complete genius and enlighted (in every way)! I will not read some poem, business books or some analysis pieces more than 3 times because there would be no sense in doing so!
Reblogged this on Mark Tuminello and commented:
What answer was that interviewer expecting?
I am biased on this one. I LOVE “The Sound and the Fury” and “Absalom!Absalom!” but I was 40 years old and returning to college to get an MFA when I read them (yes, three times each). I was an engineer as an undergrad, so I got ZERO liberal arts classes the first time around. Taking a class on Faulkner, another on Joyce, and others including the Romance poets, was like being a cat in catnip. I rolled around in the stuff for three years and loved every minute of it.
Love it! I love Faulkner, and I’m going to give this quote to my AP Lit kids 😉
poor kids. I can hear their groaning all the way over here.
Great quote, but he’ll never be my cup of tea no matter how many times I try.
ha! I’m inclined to greatly admire him, while also thinking that he must be an asshole. Why does his work deserve to be read 4 times just because it’s hard to comprehend? That’s not really a question aimed at Faulkner specifically, but more of a general observation about difficult-to-understand books. Granted, sometimes more difficult books are worth reading because they are challenging & change our world view, but other times I think the writer just gets wrapped up in their own so-called “genius” and intentionally obfuscates his or her meaning. And the latter practice frustrates me greatly.
Reblogged this on Master Mindz Afrika (NGO) @EmmanuelOdufejo.
Reblogged this on Da Bears.
In my experience, many “classic authors” are unreadable. Faulkner is near the top of this pile. To suggest otherwise is the first step to booksnobdom (sweet word eh?).
Read it four times? Hey Mr. Faulkner, didn’t your dad tell you to do your job right the first time?
Faulkner: “Hemingway has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary.”
Hemingway: “Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?”
Reblogged this on sarahremy.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Subscribe to stay updated on what I'm reading!
Join 51,388 other followers
Connect With 101 Books on Facebook!
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.