Skip to content

Book #46: The Grapes Of Wrath

Sometimes, bad weather just sucks.

You can be hanging out one minute, relaxing with friends, and 10 minutes later you’re cramped in a tiny closet while a tornado rips the roof off your house.

That’s the quick, almost instantaneous stuff. And then there’s droughts—months and years of little to no rain—that ravage the landscape and make life hell on earth for farmers.

That’s how The Grapes Of Wrath begins—right in the middle of one of the worst droughts in U.S. History, the Dust Bowl drought in the 1930s.

The drought trashed the crops and brought massive dust storms that ripped up soil and made it almost impossible to farm for years to come. That’s when “The Okies”—as they were derogatorily called—decided to pack up and move out.

In The Grapes Of Wrath, John Steinbeck takes us along with the Joads—a farming family who decides to move toward California, where they’ve been “promised” jobs picking oranges, peaches and such. The trip itself, in a 1930s jalopy packed full of people and stuff, takes up half the novel.

Once the Joads reach California, their bad luck only continues. Tom, Ma, Pa, Rose of Sharon and crew have a tough go of it. Make no mistake: This is another tale of sadness and woe.

What I love about The Grapes of Wrath is its historical significance. The Dust Bowl Drought did happen. Thousands of people were displaced. Many people did die trying to reach California in summer heat. All of that emotion and drama is captured in the novel.

As I mentioned last week, the novel was originally supposed to be a photo book, featuring the photography of Horace Bristol and Steinbeck’s copy. The haunting photos said so much at just a glance. So it’s easy to see how Steinbeck realized he had novel material on his hands. And he turned this into a strong, moving book.

Thematically, The Grapes of Wrath is essentially a pitch for socialism. Honest people were trying to get honest work and, in return, were harassed, threatened, and even killed by corporate landowners. The novel’s premise is explained this way in Chapter 14.

This is the beginning—from “I” to “we”. If you who own the things people must have could understand this, you might preserve yourself. If you could separate causes from results, if you could know that Paine, Marx, Jefferson, Lenin were results, not causes, you might survive. But that you cannot know. For the quality of owning freezes you forever into “I”, and cuts you off forever from the “we”.

So, obviously, being published in the 1930s in America, this was an extremely controversial novel. To this day, it’s still banned in many schools—probably more because of the frequent cursing rather than the socialism.

From my point of view, The Grapes of Wrath felt a little preachy, not unlike Native Son. But, while I dislike preachy novels, it’s hard to sit here 80 years later, without hardly any understanding of the cultural dynamics and social injustices that brought this about, and criticize Steinbeck.

Sure, I can do that. I dislike socialism. I dislike the preachy tone of The Grapes of Wrath at times. But it’s too easy to say “This novel promotes socialism! It sucks!” That’s just poor form.

The book itself is brilliant. Steinbeck did exactly what he set out to do when he first developed the idea of a novel after working with Horace Bristol. He really helps you visualize exactly what the Joad Family is going through, and I think a lot of that inspiration comes from his initial experience on the photo project.

The trip to California, though it takes up a long portion of the novel, is filled with poignant insights. I love the following passage that sums up the experience:

The people in flight streamed out on 66, sometimes a single car, sometimes a little caravan. All day they rolled slowly along the road, and at night they stopped near water. In the day ancient leaky radiators sent up columns of steam, loose connecting rods hammered and pounded. And the men driving the trucks and the overloaded cars listened apprehensively. How far between towns? It is a terror between towns. If something breaks–well, if something breaks we camp right here while Jim walks to town and gets a part and walks back and–how much food we got? Listen to the motor. Listen to the wheels. Listen with your ears and with your hands on the steering wheel; listen with the palm of your hand on the gear-shift lever; listen with your feet on the floor boards. Listen to the pounding old jalopy with all your senses; for a change of tone, a variation of rhythm may mean–a week here?

That’s a beautiful passage that really illustrates the emotion of traveling cross country in overfilled cars over crappy roads. With limited food and water, and in the heat, a broken down car could mean being stranded for a week, which could possibly mean death. That’s a lot of pressure to put on a little old lug nut.

Even more, the novel is filled with philosophy, as told by a blue collar, working family from the 1930s, like this passage:

“If he needs a million acres to make him feel rich, seems to me he needs it ’cause he feels awful poor inside hisself, and if he’s poor in hisself, there ain’t no million acres gonna make him feel rich, an’ maybe he’s disappointed that nothin’ he can do ‘ll make him feel rich.”

So poignant.

My favorite aspect of The Grapes Of Wrath is Steinbeck’s narrative technique. He alternates between telling the specific story of The Joads and the general story of everything else going on with the migration, the Okies, and the dust bowl drought in general.

John Steinbeck (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Basically, he zooms out to a more general picture in one chapter, then zooms in on the Joads the next chapter, then zooms back out, back in, and keeps alternating like that throughout the entire novel.

It’s an outstanding technique that really allows you to see the crisis one family is experiencing while you also see the overall situation as well.

One adjustment you’ll have to make while reading is the dialogue. It’s rough, colloquial, and full of Midwestern slang from the 1930s. In a way, Steinbeck’s dialogue, filled with phonetic spellings, reminds me a lot of Margaret Mitchell’s in Gone With The Wind. The main difference being that his dialogue is a little more comprehensible.

All around, The Grapes Of Wrath is an outstanding book well worth its place as one of the most prominent novels in American literature. Steinbeck seamlessly pulls together themes of politics, prejudice, family, corporate ethics, agriculture—all while presenting them in a sometimes light, sometimes dark, and sometimes humorous way. He’s a fantastic writer.

Ultimately, I’m a fan of this novel, despite its preachy overtones. The Grapes of Wrath is an absolute must-read—if only for its touching portrayal of a dark time in American history.

Other Stuff

The Opening Line: “To the red country and part of the gray country of Oklahoma, the last rains came gently, and they did not cut the scarred earth.”

The Meaning: “The Grapes of Wrath”—the term—actually comes from a line in “The Battle Hymn Of The Republic”:

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord:
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:
His truth is marching on.

Those lyrics refer to a passage in Revelation 14 of the Bible.

Unofficially, I can’t help but think the novel has dual meaning—seeing as how, on two occasions, characters in the novel get a case of the howling skitters from eating green grapes. Now those are really grapes of wrath.  

Highlights: Great character development and dialogue. I love fiction based on real-events, and this novel is one of the best. Steinbeck throws you into the middle of one of the most brutal economic and weather events in American history. This novel can be surprisingly humorous at times.

Lowlights: Preachy and political—too much so in some cases. A lot of slang in the dialogue, but thankfully my edition included a glossary. And, will the Joads ever freakin’ get to California?

Memorable Line: “How can you frighten a man whose hunger is not only in his own cramped stomach but in the wretched bellies of his children? You can’t scare him–he has known a fear beyond every other.”

Final Thoughts: Great read. It’s not Gatsby or Claudius or Catch 22, in my opinion, but it’s a beautiful yet depressing (shocking, isn’t it?) story. You can’t really call yourself a reader unless you’ve read The Grapes of Wrath. Just watch out for the skitters.

46 Comments Post a comment
  1. Matt #

    Great, thorough review of a awesome book. Last read it in high school and I think I’ll pick it up again.

    Liked by 1 person

    August 27, 2012
  2. I am so glad that your blog prompted me to re-read this book. I just got through a string of fluff books (hey, it’s summer, right?) and I needed something that I could really sink my teeth into, and of course Steinbeck is good for that. I’ve only gotten to Chapter 10 so far, but I can already tell that your review is spot on. Even if a bit too didactic, his writing is brilliant.

    Liked by 1 person

    August 27, 2012
    • Awesome. I agree. The writing is so, so, so good, unlike this sentence. 50% less preaching and it would have been the perfect book.

      Liked by 1 person

      August 27, 2012
  3. yesss! i’m definitely gonna re-read this one – i wrote a term paper on the grapes of wrath in my last year of high school. when i did well on the paper, it spurred the decision for me to choose lit as my major in university 🙂 thanks for sharing this! x


    August 27, 2012
    • If any novel could inspire you to choose a major, this one would fit in that category. Hope it turned out well!

      Liked by 1 person

      August 28, 2012
  4. I just finished it myself last week, and was in a sort of literary shock afterwards. Without a doubt one of the finest books I have read. And being sort of a socialist, the preachy parts actually made me like it more (then again, I live in terrible, dystopian socialist Scandinavia).

    Your review and discussion of it is far better than mine ( ) and I thank you for it.


    August 27, 2012
    • Great review. I like what you said about how clear it is that this novel is a classic piece of literature, whether you *like* it or not. I’m learning that I can dislike the concept/premise of a novel but still respect it as a great piece of literature. Especially in this case. Steinbeck did exactly what he set out to do, and that’s a success.


      August 28, 2012
  5. I have socialist leanings myself so I also enjoyed those overtones. I find it striking and interesting in the passage that you cite that it contains not just reference to Lenin and Marx but also Paine and Jefferson (my idol). I have some admiration for art that takes a stance for something. With all the moral relativism that dominates everything, it’s nice to see someone that has a belief. That being said, I don’t know if I would react as favorably if it was a belief I didn’t share, so kudos to you on your open mindedness.


    August 27, 2012
    • See my above comment. I’m still learning how to appreciate a work of art even if I don’t see eye to eye with its premise. TGOW was fairly easy to like…Lolita much more difficult.


      August 28, 2012
  6. I’m going to to and tackle this one in the fall. Great review – gives me the motivation to read it.


    August 28, 2012
  7. Love this review, very clear and emotionally written, carry on!


    September 23, 2012
  8. This was the book that changed my library forever and REALLY introduced me to a wealth of fantastic American literature, despite the fact I had read Of Mice & Men, Cannery Row and Sweet Thursday already.
    Socialist overtones never did bother me much but the less said about that the better.

    No author ever engages me in the way that Steinbeck does; by the time he wrote this novel he had found his voice and he spoke beautiful (albeit somewhat tragic) words with it.


    February 22, 2013
    • Loved this book. Felt it gave me an insight better into America in particular. Couldn’t really believe that if conditions were that horrific, why isn’t it reported more. It seemed to me that what was going on was as bad as the Irish Famine in the 1840’s?


      July 14, 2014

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The Quotable Grapes of Wrath | 101 Books
  2. Your Story Doesn’t Need A Moral | 101 Books
  3. What Is A Protest Novel? | 101 Books
  4. Book #48: Invisible Man | 101 Books
  5. Literary Characters As President: The Good & Bad | 101 Books
  6. Next Up: The Great Gatsby | 101 Books
  7. Should You Name Your Kid After Literary Characters? | 101 Books
  8. How Does Your Job Influence What You Read? | 101 Books
  9. 101 Books At The Halfway Point | 101 Books
  10. Pale Fire: The Greatest Novel Of The 20th Century? | 101 Books
  11. Ranking The First 51 Books | 101 Books
  12. 7 Parenting Lessons From Literature | 101 Books
  13. My 2-Year-Old Judges Books By Their Covers | 101 Books
  14. Top 100 English-Speaking Novels | Osman Gashi
  15. Book #60: A Death In The Family | 101 Books
  16. The First 60: A Look Back | 101 Books
  17. What Type Of Reader Are You? | 101 Books
  18. 10 Book Recommendations For People You Hate | 101 Books
  19. The Do’s And Don’ts Of Reading On A Plane | 101 Books
  20. “Where else should they go but California?” | 101 Books
  21. My 7 Rules Of Loaning Books | 101 Books
  22. All 32 NFL Teams Reimagined As Famous Authors | 101 Books
  23. 15 Book Spoilers In One Sentence | 101 Books
  24. 20 Fictional Characters I’d Have A Beer With | 101 Books
  25. The First 70: A Look Back | 101 Books
  26. Does An Author’s Personal Life Influence You? | 101 Books
  27. The 2nd Annual Literary Trick Or Treat! | 101 Books
  28. Bookish Pet Peeve #8: Preachy Authors | 101 Books
  29. The First 80: A Look Back | 101 Books
  30. Louis CK On “The Grapes of Wrath” Ending | 101 Books
  31. 9 Book Recommendations For Annoying Family Members | 101 Books
  32. 9 Book Recommendations For Annoying Family Members | My Blog
  33. Louis CK On “The Grapes of Wrath” Ending | My Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: