So this is a little tradition I have here at 101 Books.
The day before Thanksgiving, I always post a few literary-themed things I’m thankful for. As I started making the list for this year, I originally wanted to keep it different than years past. But what if I’m thankful for the same things every year?
As I read the post from 2011, my first year giving “literary thanks,” I decided that post still sums up my feelings perfectly. Why reinvent the wheel?
So here’s my original list of literary thanks, with one small addition. It’s still very relevant today.
Here we go. I’m thankful for…
This is possibly my favorite quote from any book–fiction or otherwise.
Let me give a little context if you’re not familiar with it, though. On February 4, 1990, when Voyager 1 was exiting the Solar System and entering interstellar space, NASA commanded Voyager to turn its camera around and take one last photo of Earth. The photo was taken from 3. 7 billion miles away. Earth, about the size of a pixel, appears as a “pale blue dot.”
Four years later, Carl Sagan wrote about that pale blue dot in his book Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space. In light of everything going on in the world today, I believe this quote is as relevant as ever. So I’ll stop writing now and let Carl Sagan take it from here. Read more
The story goes that Jack Kerouac wrote the original draft of On The Road in just three weeks and on a single 120-foot scroll of paper while living with his second wife in a Manhattan apartment on West 20th Street. All of that fueled by coffee and benzedrine, legend goes. He actually taped individual pieces of paper together to create the scroll.
Over the next 6 years, Kerouac would revise the text until On The Road was finally published in 1957. He wrote the scroll single space, without paragraph breaks. Also, of legend, the last few pages of the scroll were ripped because a dog named “Patchkee” ate them up. Read more
This will be my second (maybe third?) go around with On The Road. About 15 years ago, I would’ve told you that On the Road was one of my favorite novels.
These days? I’m not so sure.
It’s the perfect novel for a 24 year old who’s still trying to figure stuff out—and one who can pick up and go on a road trip across the country on a few day’s notice. But that’s not me anymore…so I wonder how my age and life situation will influence my view of this novel.
I guess we’ll find out.
Here are a few fun facts about On the Road and Jack Kerouac: Read more
Finally, I finished Midnight’s Children.
That’s not an indictment of the novel, although it isn’t necessarily a light-hearted, quick read by any means. At 500+ pages, Midnight’s Children isn’t the type of novel you’re going to plow through in a couple of days. That said, it shouldn’t take a couple of months, like it took me, either.
Midnight’s Children is an interesting novel. It’s part allegory, part historical fiction, part something called “magical realism.” It’s a well thought out, extremely detailed book. It’s the type of book that, as you’re reading, you have a feeling that you might be missing something. For most of the time, I was thinking…am I smart enough to read this novel? Read more
Well, I don’t know about you, but I relish every opportunity to make fun of a politician.
And this recent infographic from Grammarly gives me a good bit of ammunition to do just that.
Which presidential candidate’s followers have the best grammar? Well, Democratic candidate Lincoln Chafee, of course!
Who? Yeah, I don’t know him either. But his followers made only 3 grammar mistakes per 100 words, according to Grammarly. To conduct the test, they visited the official Facebook pages of all 19 presidential candidates (I believe one or two might have dropped out since the study) and pulled comments from those pages.
So whose followers hadded the worst of the grammars?
No surprise here: Donald Trump.
Trumpites made nearly 13 grammar mistakes per 100 words. Funny, with Trump bloviating so much about the immigration laws and how he’s going to make America more American, or something like that, it seems his followers have a hard time speaking English.
Overall, Democrats are much more well spoken (or well written) than Republicans–for what that’s worth. I blame the liberal media.
Anyway, here’s the full infographic. I’m sure, no matter who you support in the 2016 election, you’ll represent said candidate with exceptionally exceptional grammar. Read more